![yield of pcr](https://armstronggenetics3.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/yield-of-pcr1.png?w=600)
Table 1: Yield (ng/µL) of products (ycf1 4-1 to 4-11) were collected by using nano-drop technology (2nd column). Date of collecting data was recorded (3rd column).
Mary C., Carly S. and Tram N. performed a PCR cleanup experiment using Nano-drop technology on ten of the original eleven DNA samples, excluding 4-10 (lane 11, refer to PCR post https://armstronggenetics3.wordpress.com/category/results/pcr-data/ycf1/). According to table 1. we obtained a high yield of products, previously evident in our gel (thick bands denote high product concentrations) for the PCR that followed initial DNA extractions. It was necessary to exclude DNA sample 4-10 because of its failure to produce an adequate amount of product, evident by the lack of band in the gel. This may be due to error on our part since, when Carly S. ran the gel she neglected to submerge it in buffer. However it is most likely that the DNA extraction was ineffective and the sample was inadequate to the point that no amplification occurred.
This Post was a collaborative effort of Mary C. and Tram N.
You must be logged in to post a comment.